The Europa Conference League, the youngest UEFA competition, has quickly gained a significant fan base and attracted the attention of bettors. The high volume of games presents an excellent opportunity to make extra cash, and UEFA Conference League odds are always popular at domestic and offshore sportsbooks.
As you explore the internet, you may encounter different sportsbooks. To help you, we’ve gathered a selection of The Best Football Betting Sites and their odds for the European Club League (ECL). This page offers valuable advice to enhance your UEFA Conference League betting experience.
UEFA Conference League Betting Odds
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Víkingur Reykjavík | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 2.2 120 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
2FK Borac Banja Luka | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -2 1.62 -161 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Pafos FC | 1.75 1.85 -118 |
o2.75 2.02 102 |
14 1300 |
- | o2.75 1.87 -115 |
13.57 -100 |
1.75 1.85 -118 |
o2.75 2.02 102 |
14 1300 |
1.75 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.89 -112 |
13 1200 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 5.75 475 |
5.91 491 |
5.75 475 |
5.75 475 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2FC Astana | -1.75 1.97 -103 |
u2.75 1.82 -122 |
1.24 -417 |
- | u2.75 1.87 -115 |
1.22 -455 |
-1.75 1.97 -103 |
u2.75 1.82 -122 |
1.24 -417 |
-1.75 1.87 -115 |
u2.75 1.85 |
1.22 -455 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Legia Warszawa | 1.25 1.8 -125 |
o2.5 1.93 -108 |
7.75 675 |
- | o2.5 1.95 -105 |
8.25 -100 |
1.25 1.8 -125 |
o2.5 1.93 -108 |
7.75 675 |
1.25 1.87 -115 |
o2.5 1.91 -110 |
8 700 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 4.3 330 |
4.4 340 |
4.3 330 |
4.3 330 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2FC Dinamo Minsk | -1.25 2.05 105 |
u2.5 1.89 -112 |
1.45 -222 |
- | u2.5 1.8 -125 |
1.4 -250 |
-1.25 2.05 105 |
u2.5 1.89 -112 |
1.45 -222 |
-1.25 1.87 -115 |
u2.5 1.83 |
1.4 -250 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1FK TSC Bačka Topola | -0.75 1.8 -125 |
o2.75 1.93 -108 |
1.61 -164 |
-1 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.88 -114 |
1.56 -179 |
-0.75 1.8 -125 |
o2.75 1.93 -108 |
1.61 -164 |
-1 1.95 -105 |
o2.75 1.87 -115 |
1.61 -164 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 4.15 315 |
4.18 318 |
4.15 315 |
3.95 295 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2FC Lugano | 0.75 2.05 105 |
u2.75 1.89 -112 |
5.37 437 |
1 1.88 -114 |
u2.75 1.87 -115 |
5.45 445 |
0.75 2.05 105 |
u2.75 1.89 -112 |
5.37 437 |
1 1.8 -125 |
u2.75 1.87 |
5.2 420 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Gent | -0.75 1.88 -114 |
o2.75 1.98 -102 |
1.69 -145 |
- | o2.75 1.88 -114 |
1.65 -154 |
-0.75 1.88 -114 |
o2.75 1.98 -102 |
1.69 -145 |
-0.75 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.95 -105 |
1.71 -141 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.9 290 |
3.9 290 |
3.9 290 |
3.7 270 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Omonoia FC | 0.75 1.93 -108 |
u2.75 1.85 -118 |
4.9 390 |
- | u2.75 1.85 -118 |
5 400 |
0.75 1.93 -108 |
u2.75 1.85 -118 |
4.9 390 |
0.75 1.87 -115 |
u2.75 1.8 |
4.5 350 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1HJK Helsinki | 0.5 1.82 -122 |
o2.25 1.85 -118 |
3.9 290 |
0.5 1.77 -130 |
o2.25 1.88 -114 |
3.7 -100 |
0.5 1.82 -122 |
o2.25 1.85 -118 |
3.9 290 |
0.5 1.77 -130 |
o2.25 1.82 -122 |
3.7 270 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.35 235 |
3.2 220 |
3.35 235 |
3.2 220 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2NK Olimpija Ljubljana | -0.5 2.02 102 |
u2.25 1.97 -103 |
2.02 102 |
-0.5 2 100 |
u2.25 1.87 -115 |
2.05 105 |
-0.5 2.02 102 |
u2.25 1.97 -103 |
2.02 102 |
-0.5 2 100 |
u2.25 1.93 |
2.05 105 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Petrocub Hîncești | 1.5 2.03 103 |
o3 2.05 105 |
10.5 950 |
- | o3 1.87 -115 |
10.34 -100 |
1.5 2.03 103 |
o3 2.05 105 |
10.5 950 |
1.75 1.78 -128 |
o3 1.93 -108 |
9.75 875 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 5.7 470 |
5.64 464 |
5.7 470 |
5.4 440 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Rapid Wien | -1.5 1.81 -123 |
u3 1.8 -125 |
1.28 -357 |
- | u3 1.87 -115 |
1.26 -385 |
-1.5 1.81 -123 |
u3 1.8 -125 |
1.28 -357 |
-1.75 1.98 -102 |
u3 1.82 |
1.27 -370 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Shamrock Rovers | -0.5 1.86 -116 |
o2.25 1.84 -119 |
1.86 -116 |
-0.5 1.82 -122 |
o2.25 1.78 -128 |
1.83 -120 |
-0.5 1.86 -116 |
o2.25 1.84 -119 |
1.86 -116 |
-0.5 1.82 -122 |
o2.25 1.78 -128 |
1.83 -120 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.44 244 |
3.25 225 |
3.44 244 |
3.25 225 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2The New Saints FC | 0.5 1.96 -104 |
u2.25 1.99 -101 |
4.5 350 |
0.5 1.93 -108 |
u2.25 1.98 -102 |
4.5 350 |
0.5 1.96 -104 |
u2.25 1.99 -101 |
4.5 350 |
0.5 1.93 -108 |
u2.25 1.98 |
4.5 350 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Hearts | -0.25 1.98 -102 |
o2.5 2 100 |
2.35 135 |
- | o2.5 1.92 -109 |
2.3 -100 |
-0.25 1.98 -102 |
o2.5 2 100 |
2.35 135 |
-0.25 1.95 -105 |
o2.5 1.98 -102 |
2.3 130 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.4 240 |
3.15 215 |
3.4 240 |
3.15 215 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
21. FC Heidenheim | 0.25 1.85 -118 |
u2.5 1.83 -120 |
3.04 204 |
- | u2.5 1.83 -120 |
3 200 |
0.25 1.85 -118 |
u2.5 1.83 -120 |
3.04 204 |
0.25 1.8 -125 |
u2.5 1.78 |
3 200 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1APOEL FC | 0.75 1.91 -110 |
o2.5 1.93 -108 |
5.2 420 |
- | o2.5 1.87 -115 |
5.17 -100 |
0.75 1.91 -110 |
o2.5 1.93 -108 |
5.2 420 |
0.75 1.93 -108 |
o2.5 1.91 -110 |
5.2 420 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.7 270 |
3.69 269 |
3.7 270 |
3.5 250 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Fiorentina | -0.75 1.91 -110 |
u2.5 1.88 -114 |
1.7 -143 |
- | u2.5 1.89 -112 |
1.66 -152 |
-0.75 1.91 -110 |
u2.5 1.88 -114 |
1.7 -143 |
-0.75 1.82 -122 |
u2.5 1.83 |
1.67 -149 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1LASK | 0.5 1.86 -116 |
o2.75 2.02 102 |
3.75 275 |
0.5 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.93 -108 |
3.84 -100 |
0.5 1.86 -116 |
o2.75 2.02 102 |
3.75 275 |
0.5 1.82 -122 |
o2.75 1.93 -108 |
3.9 290 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.66 266 |
3.62 262 |
3.66 266 |
3.3 230 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Cercle Brugge KSV | -0.5 1.96 -104 |
u2.75 1.82 -122 |
1.96 -104 |
-0.5 1.87 -115 |
u2.75 1.82 -122 |
1.89 -112 |
-0.5 1.96 -104 |
u2.75 1.82 -122 |
1.96 -104 |
-0.5 1.93 -108 |
u2.75 1.82 |
1.95 -105 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Chelsea | -3.25 1.88 -114 |
o4 1.88 -114 |
1.03 -3333 |
- | o4 1.83 -120 |
1.03 -3333 |
-3.25 1.88 -114 |
o4 1.88 -114 |
1.03 -3333 |
-3.25 1.87 -115 |
o4 1.8 -125 |
1.03 -3333 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 19 1800 |
17 1600 |
19 1800 |
16 1500 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2FC Noah | 3.25 1.94 -106 |
u4 1.94 -106 |
34 3300 |
- | u4 1.92 -109 |
34 3300 |
3.25 1.94 -106 |
u4 1.94 -106 |
34 3300 |
3.25 1.87 -115 |
u4 1.95 |
34 3300 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Djurgardens IF | 0.25 1.98 -102 |
o2.5 1.95 -105 |
3.5 250 |
- | o2.5 1.87 -115 |
3.3 -100 |
0.25 1.98 -102 |
o2.5 1.95 -105 |
3.5 250 |
0.25 1.89 -112 |
o2.5 1.89 -112 |
3.3 230 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.33 233 |
3.2 220 |
3.33 233 |
3.2 220 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Panathinaikos FC | -0.25 1.85 -118 |
u2.5 1.87 -115 |
2.16 116 |
- | u2.5 1.91 -110 |
2.15 115 |
-0.25 1.85 -118 |
u2.5 1.87 -115 |
2.16 116 |
-0.25 1.85 -118 |
u2.5 1.85 |
2.15 115 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1FC Copenhagen | -1 1.88 -114 |
o2.5 1.81 -123 |
1.53 -189 |
-1 1.8 -125 |
o2.75 1.89 -112 |
1.51 -196 |
-1 1.88 -114 |
o2.5 1.81 -123 |
1.53 -189 |
-1 1.8 -125 |
o2.75 1.98 -102 |
1.51 -196 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 4.3 330 |
4.1 310 |
4.3 330 |
4.1 310 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2İstanbul Başakşehir FK | 1 1.94 -106 |
u2.5 2.03 103 |
6.18 518 |
1 1.95 -105 |
u2.75 1.85 -118 |
6 500 |
1 1.94 -106 |
u2.5 2.03 103 |
6.18 518 |
1 1.95 -105 |
u2.75 1.78 |
6 500 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Larne FC | -1.25 1.85 -118 |
o3 1.93 -108 |
1.42 -238 |
- | o3 1.87 -115 |
1.4 -250 |
-1.25 1.85 -118 |
o3 1.93 -108 |
1.42 -238 |
-1.25 1.85 -118 |
o3 1.98 -102 |
1.4 -250 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 5 400 |
4.7 370 |
5 400 |
4.7 370 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2FC St. Gallen | 1.25 1.97 -103 |
u3 1.88 -114 |
6.95 595 |
- | u3 1.87 -115 |
6.5 550 |
1.25 1.97 -103 |
u3 1.88 -114 |
6.95 595 |
1.25 1.89 -112 |
u3 1.78 |
6.5 550 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Vitória SC | 1.5 1.97 -103 |
o2.75 1.83 -120 |
11 1000 |
1.5 1.93 -108 |
o3 1.92 -109 |
9.25 -100 |
1.5 1.97 -103 |
o2.75 1.83 -120 |
11 1000 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 5.55 455 |
5.2 420 |
5.55 455 |
- | - | - | ||||||||||||
2FK Mladá Boleslav | -1.5 1.85 -118 |
u2.75 2 100 |
1.29 -345 |
-1.5 1.82 -122 |
u3 1.83 -120 |
1.29 -345 |
-1.5 1.85 -118 |
u2.75 2 100 |
1.29 -345 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Jagiellonia Białystok | 0.25 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.96 -104 |
3.1 210 |
- | o2.75 1.88 -114 |
3.1 -100 |
0.25 1.87 -115 |
o2.75 1.96 -104 |
3.1 210 |
0.25 1.82 -122 |
o2.5 1.78 -128 |
3.05 205 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 3.55 255 |
3.55 255 |
3.55 255 |
3.3 230 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2Molde FK | -0.25 1.95 -105 |
u2.75 1.86 -116 |
2.25 125 |
- | u2.75 1.86 -116 |
2.25 125 |
-0.25 1.95 -105 |
u2.75 1.86 -116 |
2.25 125 |
-0.25 1.93 -108 |
u2.5 1.98 |
2.25 125 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Thu, 7 Nov | ||||||||||||||||||
1Real Betis | 2 1.85 -118 |
o3.25 2.02 102 |
12.6 1160 |
2 1.85 -118 |
o3.25 1.87 -115 |
13 -100 |
2 1.85 -118 |
o3.25 2.02 102 |
12.6 1160 |
2 1.85 -118 |
o3.25 1.89 -112 |
13 1200 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
XDraw | 6.5 550 |
6.5 550 |
6.5 550 |
6.5 550 |
- | - | ||||||||||||
2NK Celje | -2 1.97 -103 |
u3.25 1.82 -122 |
1.22 -455 |
-2 1.89 -112 |
u3.25 1.91 -110 |
1.18 -556 |
-2 1.97 -103 |
u3.25 1.82 -122 |
1.22 -455 |
-2 1.89 -112 |
u3.25 1.85 |
1.18 -556 |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Reading UEFA Conference League Odds
Sportsbooks typically present their odds in three different ways:
Usually, you can customize the display format on sportsbook websites according to your preference. However, if you cannot find this option, we have provided detailed explanations for each available format.
American UEFA Conference League Odds
This one is easy. The American odds, or moneylines, show two things, depending on whether there is a positive or a negative sign:
- How high the bet needs to be for a $100 profit – negative moneyline
- How high is the profit with a $100 bet – positive moneyline
The negative moneyline represents the favorite in a game or a pick with better chances of occurring, while the positive moneyline signifies the underdog.
Here is an example:
Bet On | Moneyline/ American Betting Odds |
---|---|
Fiorentina | -250 |
Draw | +250 |
PAOK | +210 |
Fiorentina is a firm favorite in this scenario, while the Greek side, PAOK, is the underdog. The larger the number, the more significant the difference in chances. For example, if Fiorentina’s odds were at -500, their chances of winning would be even higher. The same applies to the positive moneyline – if PAOK’s odds were at +500, their chances of winning would be considered remote.
Calculating profits is a straightforward process. If you bet $250 on Fiorentina and they win, you would make a profit of $100. On the other hand, if you bet $100 on PAOK and they win, your profit would be $210.
When discussing the Conference League winner’s odds, you can often stumble upon examples in which all the moneylines are positive, such as:
Bet On | Moneyline/ American Betting Odds |
---|---|
West Ham | +350 |
Fiorentina | +450 |
Koln | +500 |
Aston Villa | +650 |
Here, the team with the lowest positive moneyline, West Ham at +350, is the top favorite.
Decimal UEFA Conference League Odds
UEFA Conference League odds are also presented in decimal numbers, the most commonly used method. Take a look at this example:
Bet On | Decimal Betting Odds |
---|---|
Partizan | 1.85 |
Draw | 3.50 |
Koln | 2.80 |
Remember that the closer the odds are to the number 1, the higher the likelihood of that bet succeeding.
For example, Partizan is a moderate favorite. On the other hand, the higher the decimal odds, the lower the chances of the bet being successful. Therefore, in the context of the game mentioned above, a draw is the least likely outcome.
The process is divided into two parts:
- Figuring out the returns
- Calculating net profit
- First Part: Figuring Out the Returns
To figure out the returns, multiply the odds by the stake. For example, if we pick Partizan to win and bet $100, the calculation would be:
$100×1.85=$185
- Second Part: Calculating Net Profit
To find the net profits, deduct the stake from the returns:
$185−$100=$85
So, the profit from this bet is $85.
Example: Betting on the Underdog
When betting on the underdog (Koln), the profit would be higher:
$100×2.80=$280 (Return)
$280−$100=$180 (Profit)
Thus, the profit from betting on Koln would be $180.
Fractional UEFA Conference League Odds
The last method of presenting the odds is through fractions.
First of all, the fraction is composed of two parts: the first number, which is called the numerator, and the second, the denominator.
Check out this example:
Bet On | Fractional Betting Odds |
---|---|
Aston Villa | 1/4 |
Draw | 5/2 |
Ajax | 3/1 |
When looking at Aston Villa, the numerator is 1, and the denominator is 4. They are the favorites in this event because the numerator/denominator ratio is below 1. The lower the ratio, the bigger the favorite team is. On the other hand, the higher it becomes, the fewer chances the team has of coming out as the winner.
Determining the profits is different from what you saw until now. The stake and the numerator are multiplied, and the result is then split with the denominator.
Let’s say we are going to bet $100 on Aston Villa. We need to multiply that with the numerator and split with the denominator.
($100×1)/4 = $100/4= $25
UEFA Conference League Betting Tips
The Europa Conference League is still evolving. Some teams view it as an opportunity to enhance their reputation, while others consider it an obligation and a burden. Below, we have provided some guidelines to consider before making a decision.
- Team’s Domestic Situation — Teams from the big leagues, like the Premiership, La Liga, Bundesliga, etc., could consider the ECL less worthy compared to domestic leagues or cups, particularly when they have a big-time game coming. In those situations, we see them sacrificing the Conference League, especially if the competition is still in the group stage.
- Mixed Lineups — We’ve mentioned that some of the big teams aren’t interested in playing this competition with 100% of their power, so they mix the lineup, giving a chance to some youngsters to show their worth and test them. Therefore, be sure to check out the lineup before placing any bets.